CVE-2019-6260: Gaining control of BMC from the host processor

This is details for CVE-2019-6260 – which has been nicknamed “pantsdown” due to the nature of feeling that we feel that we’ve “caught chunks of the industry with their…” and combined with the fact that naming things is hard, so if you pick a bad name somebody would have to come up with a better one before we publish.

I expect OpenBMC to have a statement shortly.

The ASPEED ast2400 and ast2500 Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) hardware and firmware implement Advanced High-performance Bus (AHB) bridges, which allow arbitrary read and write access to the BMC’s physical address space from the host, or from the network if the BMC console uart is attached to a serial concentrator (this is atypical for most systems).

Common configuration of the ASPEED BMC SoC’s hardware features leaves it open to “remote” unauthenticated compromise from the host and from the BMC console. This stems from AHB bridges on the LPC and PCIe buses, another on the BMC console UART (hardware password protected), and the ability of the X-DMA engine to address all of the BMC’s M-Bus (memory bus).

This affects multiple BMC firmware stacks, including OpenBMC, AMI’s BMC, and SuperMicro. It is independent of host processor architecture, and has been observed on systems with x86_64 processors IBM POWER processors (there is no reason to suggest that other architectures wouldn’t be affected, these are just the ones we’ve been able to get access to)

The LPC, PCIe and UART AHB bridges are all explicitly features of Aspeed’s designs: They exist to recover the BMC during firmware development or to allow the host to drive the BMC hardware if the BMC has no firmware of its own. See section 1.9 of the AST2500 Software Programming Guide.

The typical consequence of external, unauthenticated, arbitrary AHB access is that the BMC fails to ensure all three of confidentiality, integrity and availability for its data and services. For instance it is possible to:

  1. Reflash or dump the firmware of a running BMC from the host
  2. Perform arbitrary reads and writes to BMC RAM
  3. Configure an in-band BMC console from the host
  4. “Brick” the BMC by disabling the CPU clock until the next AC power cycle

Using 1 we can obviously implant any malicious code we like, with the impact of BMC downtime while the flashing and reboot take place. This may take the form of minor, malicious modifications to the officially provisioned BMC image, as we can extract, modify, then repackage the image to be re-flashed on the BMC. As the BMC potentially has no secure boot facility it is likely difficult to detect such actions.

Abusing 3 may require valid login credentials, but combining 1 and 2 we can simply change the locks on the BMC by replacing all instances of the root shadow password hash in RAM with a chosen password hash – one instance of the hash is in the page cache, and from that point forward any login process will authenticate with the chosen password.

We obtain the current root password hash by using 1 to dump the current flash content, then using https://github.com/ReFirmLabs/binwalk to extract the rootfs, then simply loop-mount the rootfs to access /etc/shadow. At least one BMC stack doesn’t require this, and instead offers “Press enter for console”.

IBM has internally developed a proof-of-concept application that we intend to open-source, likely as part of the OpenBMC project, that demonstrates how to use the interfaces and probes for their availability. The intent is that it be added to platform firmware test
suites as a platform security test case. The application requires root user privilege on the host system for the LPC and PCIe bridges, or normal user privilege on a remote system to exploit the debug UART interface. Access from userspace demonstrates the vulnerability of systems in bare-metal cloud hosting lease arrangements where the BMC
is likely in a separate security domain to the host.

OpenBMC Versions affected: Up to at least 2.6, all supported Aspeed-based platforms

It only affects systems using the ASPEED ast2400, ast2500 SoCs. There has not been any investigation into other hardware.

The specific issues are listed below, along with some judgement calls on their risk.

iLPC2AHB bridge Pt I

State: Enabled at cold start
Description: A SuperIO device is exposed that provides access to the BMC’s address-space
Impact: Arbitrary reads and writes to the BMC address-space
Risk: High – known vulnerability and explicitly used as a feature in some platform designs
Mitigation: Can be disabled by configuring a bit in the BMC’s LPC controller, however see Pt II.

iLPC2AHB bridge Pt II

State: Enabled at cold start
Description: The bit disabling the iLPC2AHB bridge only removes write access – reads are still possible.
Impact: Arbitrary reads of the BMC address-space
Risk: High – we expect the capability and mitigation are not well known, and the mitigation has side-effects
Mitigation: Disable SuperIO decoding on the LPC bus (0x2E/0x4E decode). Decoding is controlled via hardware strapping and can be turned off at runtime, however disabling SuperIO decoding also removes the host’s ability to configure SUARTs, System wakeups, GPIOs and the BMC/Host mailbox

PCIe VGA P2A bridge

State: Enabled at cold start
Description: The VGA graphics device provides a host-controllable window mapping onto the BMC address-space
Impact: Arbitrary reads and writes to the BMC address-space
Risk: Medium – the capability is known to some platform integrators and may be disabled in some firmware stacks
Mitigation: Can be disabled or filter writes to coarse-grained regions of the AHB by configuring bits in the System Control Unit

DMA from/to arbitrary BMC memory via X-DMA

State: Enabled at cold start
Description: X-DMA available from VGA and BMC PCI devices
Impact: Misconfiguration can expose the entirety of the BMC’s RAM to the host
AST2400 Risk: High – SDK u-boot does not constrain X-DMA to VGA reserved memory
AST2500 Risk: Low – SDK u-boot restricts X-DMA to VGA reserved memory
Mitigation: X-DMA accesses are configured to remap into VGA reserved memory in u-boot

UART-based SoC Debug interface

State: Enabled at cold start
Description: Pasting a magic password over the configured UART exposes a hardware-provided debug shell. The capability is only exposed on one of UART1 or UART5, and interactions are only possible via the physical IO port (cannot be accessed from the host)
Impact: Misconfiguration can expose the BMC’s address-space to the network if the BMC console is made available via a serial concentrator.
Risk: Low
Mitigation: Can be disabled by configuring a bit in the System Control Unit

LPC2AHB bridge

State: Disabled at cold start
Description: Maps LPC Firmware cycles onto the BMC’s address-space
Impact: Misconfiguration can expose vulnerable parts of the BMC’s address-space to the host
Risk: Low – requires reasonable effort to configure and enable.
Mitigation: Don’t enable the feature if not required.
Note: As a counter-point, this feature is used legitimately on OpenPOWER systems to expose the boot flash device content to the host

PCIe BMC P2A bridge

State: Disabled at cold start
Description: PCI-to-BMC address-space bridge allowing memory and IO accesses
Impact: Enabling the device provides limited access to BMC address-space
Risk: Low – requires some effort to enable, constrained to specific parts of the BMC address space
Mitigation: Don’t enable the feature if not required.

Watchdog setup

State: Required system function, always available
Description: Misconfiguring the watchdog to use “System Reset” mode for BMC reboot will re-open all the “enabled at cold start” backdoors until the firmware reconfigures the hardware otherwise. Rebooting the BMC is generally possible from the host via IPMI “mc reset” command, and this may provide a window of opportunity for BMC compromise.
Impact: May allow arbitrary access to BMC address space via any of the above mechanisms
Risk: Low – “System Reset” mode is unlikely to be used for reboot due to obvious side-effects
Mitigation: Ensure BMC reboots always use “SOC Reset” mode

The CVSS score for these vulnerabilities is: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln-metrics/cvss/v3-calculator?vector=3DAV:A/AC:L/PR:=N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:U/RC:C/CR:H/IR:H/AR:M/MAV:L/MAC:L/MPR:N/MUI:N=/MS:U/MC:H/MI:H/MA:H

There is some debate on if this is a local or remote vulnerability, and it depends on if you consider the connection between the BMC and the host processor as a network or not.

The fix is platform dependent as it can involve patching both the BMC firmware and the host firmware.

For example, we have mitigated these vulnerabilities for OpenPOWER systems, both on the host and BMC side. OpenBMC has a u-boot patch that disables the features:

https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/c/openbmc/meta-phosphor/+/13290/

Which platforms can opt into in the following way:

https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/c/openbmc/meta-ibm/+/17146/

The process is opt-in for OpenBMC platforms because platform maintainers have the knowledge of if their platform uses affected hardware features. This is important when disabling the iLPC2AHB bridge as it can be a bit of a finicky process.

See also https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/docs/+/11164 for a WIP OpenBMC Security Architecture document which should eventually contain all these details.

For OpenPOWER systems, the host firmware patches are contained in op-build v2.0.11 and enabled for certain platforms. Again, this is not by default for all platforms as there is BMC work required as well as per-platform changes.

Credit for finding these problems: Andrew Jeffery, Benjamin
Herrenschmidt, Jeremy Kerr, Russell Currey, Stewart Smith. There have been many more people who have helped with this issue, and they too deserve thanks.

10 thoughts on “CVE-2019-6260: Gaining control of BMC from the host processor

  1. Pingback: CVE-2019-6260: Gaining control of BMC from the host processor | Lowmiller Consulting Group Blog

  2. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: CVE-2019-6260: Gaining control of BMC from the host processor – World Best News

  3. I believe you can get CVE’s for this category of flaws from Mitre. If/When you do please update this with CVE numbers

  4. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: CVE-2019-6260: Gaining control of BMC from the host processor – Outside The Know

  5. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: CVE-2019-6260: Gaining control of BMC from the host processor – Latest news

  6. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: CVE-2019-6260: Gaining control of BMC from the host processor – News about world

  7. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: CVE-2019-6260: Gaining control of BMC from the host processor – Hckr News

  8. Pingback: 2019-01-23 Random Interesting Shit – My Crap

  9. Pingback: Vulnerabilità in Firmware BMC – Yoroi Blog

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.