«
»

SCM performance

Linus is right when he talks about the performance of SCMs…. and that BitKeeper was about the first one to be worth using at all (really).

But as an interesting speed comparison… I’ve managed to pull the latest git (with git) and build it in less time than BitKeeper has taken to pull the latest NDB tree…. hrrm..

One of the reasons I’m so enjoying quilt for every day hacking is that it is blindingly fast.

Tags: , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Monday, June 4th, 2007 at 3:30 pm and is filed under mysql. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “SCM performance”

  1. synergy of loxal Archive » Linus Torvalds: CVS and SVN are for stupid and ugly so use git! says:
    21/07/2007 at 8:47 pm

    [...] Linus wrote an own Version Control System from scratch and called it git. Git performs even better than BitKeeper. In fact it performs very well and was developed for a distributed development environment where [...]

Leave a Reply